共查询到19条相似文献，搜索用时 843 毫秒
1.
旨在基于GBLUP等模型对梅花鹿(Cervus Nippon)生长相关性状基因组选择的预测准确性进行比较。本研究以吉林某鹿场2014—2019年所产梅花鹿261只作为研究群体(公鹿96只，母鹿165只),对梅花鹿体重体尺等生长相关性状进行遗传力估计，并基于5-fold交叉验证方法对GBLUP、Bayes A、Bayes B、Bayes C、Bayes Lasso、RRBLUP六种基因组选择模型预测准确度进行了比较，以筛选出适合梅花鹿生长相关性状的基因组选择模型。结果发现：1)管围与臀端高的遗传力分别为0.43、0.50,属于高遗传力；体重、体高与体斜长的遗传力分别为0.22、0.30、0.27,属于中等遗传力；而胸围的遗传力为0.15,属于低遗传力；2)在GBLUP中，基因组选择预测的准确度与性状的遗传力呈正相关关系，而在Bayes类与RRBLUP法中并未表现明显正相关关系；3)在样本量较少的情况下，选取GBLUP作为基因组选择模型具有一定的优势；Bayes A可在低遗传力性状中作为首选；体重、体高、体斜长、管围、胸围、臀端高预测准确度最高的分别为GBLUP、Bayes B、Bayes... 相似文献
2.
为探究一步法基因组最佳线性无偏预测(SSGBLUP)法应用于内蒙古绒山羊育种的选择效果,本研究基于课题组前期积累的健康状况良好的内蒙古绒山羊(阿尔巴斯型)2 256只个体的70 K SNP芯片测序数据,收集整理1至8岁个体的绒毛性状(绒长、绒细和产绒量)生产性能数据和系谱记录,通过设定SSGBLUP法中H逆矩阵的不同矩阵参数(ω,τ)进行基因组育种值估计,并利用五倍交叉验证法评价基因组育种值估计的准确性。结果表明：随着ω的不断增加,SSGBLUP法用于内蒙古绒山羊绒毛性状的基因组育种值估计准确性越高。结合ABLUP和GBLUP的遗传参数估计结果可知,当τ为0.3、ω为0.9时,内蒙古绒山羊绒毛性状的基因组选择准确性较好。其中,绒长的准确性为0.702 8,绒细准确性为0.668 2,产绒量准确性为0.713 1。对SSGBLUP方法的H矩阵选择合适的尺度参数可提高内蒙古绒山羊绒毛性状基因组育种值估计的准确性,加快种群的遗传改良,缩短世代间隔。 相似文献
3.
旨在探究快速型黄羽肉鸡饲料利用效率性状的遗传参数,评估不同方法所得估计育种值的准确性。本研究以自主培育的快速型黄羽肉鸡E系1 923个个体（其中公鸡1 199只,母鸡724只）为研究素材,采用"京芯一号"鸡55K SNP芯片进行基因分型。分别利用传统最佳线性无偏预测（BLUP）、基因组最佳线性无偏预测（GBLUP）和一步法（SSGBLUP）3种方法,基于加性效应模型进行遗传参数估计,通过10倍交叉验证比较3种方法所得估计育种值的准确性。研究性状包括4个生长性状和4个饲料利用效率性状：42日龄体重（BW42D）、56日龄体重（BW56D）、日均增重（ADG）、日均采食量（ADFI）和饲料转化率（FCR）、剩余采食量（RFI）、剩余增长体重（RG）、剩余采食和增长体重（RIG）。结果显示,4个饲料利用效率性状均为低遗传力（0.08~0.20）,其他生长性状为中等偏低遗传力（0.11~0.35）;4个饲料利用效率性状间均为高度遗传相关,RFI、RIG与ADFI间为中度遗传相关,RFI与ADG间无显著相关性,RIG与ADG间为低度遗传相关。本研究在获得SSGBLUP方法的最佳基因型和系谱矩阵权重比基础上,比较8个性状的估计育种值准确性,SSGBLUP方法获得的准确性分别比传统BLUP和GBLUP方法提高3.85%~14.43%和5.21%~17.89%。综上,以RIG为选择指标能够在降低日均采食量的同时保持日均增重,比RFI更适合快速型黄羽肉鸡的选育目标;采用最佳权重比进行SSGBLUP分析,对目标性状估计育种值的预测性能最优,建议作为快速型黄羽肉鸡基因组选择方法。 相似文献
4.
《中国养兔杂志》2021,(1)
基因组选择是目前最先进的畜禽育种技术,但在家兔上还未见相关报道。本研究模拟了一个家兔选育群体,设计4个微效多基因控制性状(其遗传力分别为0.05、0.10、0.25和0.40),共开展8个世代的人工选育试验。在选育群的第6和第7世代,随机选择500、1 000、1 500或2 000只个体组建用于训练遗传评估模型的训练集,在第8世代中随机选择500只个体作为验证集,训练集和验证集中的所有个体进行50 K SNP分型;在此基础上,比较分析了基于系谱信息的传统最佳线性无偏估计(PBLUP)、基于基因组信息的基因组最佳线性无偏估计(GBLUP)、和基于系谱和基因组信息的单步基因组最佳线性无偏估计(ss GBLUP)3种遗传评估模型在育种值估计上的准确性。结果发现,当训练集样本数达到1 500只时,GBLUP方法在所有遗传力情况下均优于传统的PBLUP方法,能提高约30%的准确性。当使用ss GBLUP方法时,即使在遗传力为0.05和训练集大小为500只的情况下,与PBLUP方法相比其估计准确性也具有明显地提高;随着训练集大小的增加,ss GBLUP方法估计准确性具有显著地提高,增幅可以达到1倍。因此,认为在家兔上实施基因组选择具有很强的可行性,在前期阶段可以对小规模样本进行基因分型,然后使用ssGBLUP遗传评估模型进行育种值估计。 相似文献
5.
为探究单步基因组最佳线性无偏预测(SSGBLUP)法应用于生猪育种的选择效果，选取杜洛克、长白、大白种猪共1 996头，利用SNP芯片获得个体基因型数据，结合表型数据和系谱数据，利用HIBLUP软件的SSGBLUP模型和基于系谱的最佳线性无偏预测(PBLUP)模型分别计算估计育种值，参考全国种猪遗传评估中心的标准计算综合选择指数，利用理论准确性和后裔测定成绩评估选择效果。结果表明：通过SSGBLUP法计算达100 kg日龄、达100 kg背膘厚及总产仔数的基因组估计育种值(GEBV)与PBLUP法计算的估计育种值(EBV)的相关系数均大于0.8;达100 kg日龄、达100 kg背膘厚及总产仔数GEBV准确性相对于EBV准确性均有所提高；SSGBLUP法与PBLUP法选留的长白和大白种猪，其后代的生长速度显著优于场内选择法选留种猪的后代。本试验中，SSGBLUP法与PBLUP法均能有效提高选留种猪后代的生长速度且二者分别计算的GEBV和EBV相关性高，但SSGBLUP法选种的准确性更高，后期可利用全基因组选择对场内现有种猪进行选种指导。 相似文献
6.
试验旨在进行芦花鸡H系开产性状遗传参数和育种值估计,为芦花鸡H系选育提供依据。收集芦花鸡H系2016—2020年系谱信息和开产性状表型数据,利用DMU软件以平均信息约束最大似然法（AIREML）剖分表型方差,以单性状动物模型分析各性状遗传力,以多性状动物模型分析性状间的遗传相关系数和表型相关系数,并基于系谱-加性效应模型（PBLUP＿A）对所有个体开产性状进行育种值估计,计算遗传进展。结果显示：芦花鸡H系开产日龄、开产体重和开产蛋重遗传力分别为0.42、0.40和0.27,开产日龄与开产体重、开产蛋重间的遗传相关分别为0.17、0.31,表型相关分别为0.11、0.18,开产体重和开产蛋重间遗传相关和表型相关系数分别为0.56和0.38;开产日龄、开产体重和开产蛋重年遗传进展分别为-0.014 d、1.14 g、0.018 g。结果表明：芦花鸡H系各开产性状均为中等遗传力性状,开产蛋重与开产日龄呈中等遗传正相关,与开产体重呈高遗传正相关,开产日龄与开产体重遗传相关较低,经过5个世代的选育,芦花鸡H系开产性状有了一定的遗传进展。对芦花鸡H系开产性状遗传参数和育种值的确定与分析研究结果,为... 相似文献
7.
8.
旨在将多层感知机(multilayer perceptron, MLP)应用于绵羊限性性状基因组选择中，并在多种情况下与其他经典基因组选择方法进行比较分析。本研究利用Qmsim软件模拟2个绵羊群体Pop1和Pop2的表型数据和基因型数据。在MLP中使用人工神经网络(artificial neural network, ANN),线性模型中使用约束性最大似然法(residual maximum likelihood, REML)估计不同群体的遗传参数。利用Python语言自编MLP模型，利用DMU软件实现最佳线性无偏预测(best linear unbiased prediction, BLUP)、基因组最佳线性无偏预测(genomic BLUP)和一步法(single-step GBLUP, SSGBLUP)模型，评估不同情况下各方法遗传力(heritability,h2)和育种值估计方面的差异。各情况下，MLP和SSGBLUP均显著(P<0.05)优于GBLUP和BLUP。在3种情况下MLP的h2估值与SSGBLUP差异不显著：h 相似文献
9.
为有效实现山羊基因组选择,提高选择准确性,根据前期对内蒙古绒山羊生产性能的遗传评估结果,以山羊的体重(h2=0.11)性状为例,结合NCBI已经公布的山羊基因组序列信息,设定群体传递过程和基因组参数,模拟获得个体表型和基因型数据,利用GBLUP和Bayes方法进行基因组育种值估计。结果表明,不同历史群体变化模式下,基因组选择对山羊体重基因组育种估计值准确性无显著影响(P>0.05)。GBLUP法估计的准确性高于Bayes Lasso,准确性达0.40。在历史群体下降模式下,基因组选择准确性高于恒定模式。 相似文献
10.
优质黄鸡矮小型母系繁殖性能的遗传参数估计 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
《黑龙江畜牧兽医》2016,(23)
为了测定广东温氏南方家禽育种有限公司黄羽矮小型母系N303品系第三世代鸡群的8周龄体重、开产日龄、开产体重、开产蛋重、300日龄体重、300日龄蛋重、300日龄产蛋数,试验计算了各性状的遗传力、表型和遗传相关。结果表明:除开产蛋重、300日龄体重、300日龄产蛋数外,其他性状的遗传力估计值为中等偏上,各性状遗传力估计水平与正常型品系相一致;开产日龄和300日龄产蛋数之间为中等程度的负表型和遗传相关,而开产体重和300日龄体重之间、300日龄蛋重之间为中等程度的正表型和遗传相关。 相似文献
11.
Gopal R. Gowane Sang Hong Lee Sam Clark Nasir Moghaddar Hawlader A. Al‐Mamun Julius H. J. van der Werf 《Zeitschrift für Tierzüchtung und Züchtungsbiologie》2019,136(5):390-407
Reference populations for genomic selection usually involve selected individuals, which may result in biased prediction of estimated genomic breeding values (GEBV). In a simulation study, bias and accuracy of GEBV were explored for various genetic models with individuals selectively genotyped in a typical nucleus breeding program. We compared the performance of three existing methods, that is, Best Linear Unbiased Prediction of breeding values using pedigree‐based relationships (PBLUP), genomic relationships for genotyped animals only (GBLUP) and a Single‐Step approach (SSGBLUP) using both. For a scenario with no‐selection and random mating (RR), prediction was unbiased. However, lower accuracy and bias were observed for scenarios with selection and random mating (SR) or selection and positive assortative mating (SA). As expected, bias disappeared when all individuals were genotyped and used in GBLUP. SSGBLUP showed higher accuracy compared to GBLUP, and bias of prediction was negligible with SR. However, PBLUP and SSGBLUP still showed bias in SA due to high inbreeding. SSGBLUP and PBLUP were unbiased provided that inbreeding was accounted for in the relationship matrices. Selective genotyping based on extreme phenotypic contrasts increased the prediction accuracy, but prediction was biased when using GBLUP. SSGBLUP could correct the biasedness while gaining higher accuracy than GBLUP. In a typical animal breeding program, where it is too expensive to genotype all animals, it would be appropriate to genotype phenotypically contrasting selection candidates and use a Single‐Step approach to obtain accurate and unbiased prediction of GEBV. 相似文献
12.
Impact of fitting dominance and additive effects on accuracy of genomic prediction of breeding values in layers 
下载免费PDF全文
下载免费PDF全文 M. Heidaritabar A. Wolc J. Arango J. Zeng P. Settar J.E. Fulton N.P. O'Sullivan J.W.M. Bastiaansen R.L. Fernando D.J. Garrick J.C.M. Dekkers 《Zeitschrift für Tierzüchtung und Züchtungsbiologie》2016,133(5):334-346
Most genomic prediction studies fit only additive effects in models to estimate genomic breeding values (GEBV). However, if dominance genetic effects are an important source of variation for complex traits, accounting for them may improve the accuracy of GEBV. We investigated the effect of fitting dominance and additive effects on the accuracy of GEBV for eight egg production and quality traits in a purebred line of brown layers using pedigree or genomic information (42K single‐nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) panel). Phenotypes were corrected for the effect of hatch date. Additive and dominance genetic variances were estimated using genomic‐based [genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP)‐REML and BayesC] and pedigree‐based (PBLUP‐REML) methods. Breeding values were predicted using a model that included both additive and dominance effects and a model that included only additive effects. The reference population consisted of approximately 1800 animals hatched between 2004 and 2009, while approximately 300 young animals hatched in 2010 were used for validation. Accuracy of prediction was computed as the correlation between phenotypes and estimated breeding values of the validation animals divided by the square root of the estimate of heritability in the whole population. The proportion of dominance variance to total phenotypic variance ranged from 0.03 to 0.22 with PBLUP‐REML across traits, from 0 to 0.03 with GBLUP‐REML and from 0.01 to 0.05 with BayesC. Accuracies of GEBV ranged from 0.28 to 0.60 across traits. Inclusion of dominance effects did not improve the accuracy of GEBV, and differences in their accuracies between genomic‐based methods were small (0.01–0.05), with GBLUP‐REML yielding higher prediction accuracies than BayesC for egg production, egg colour and yolk weight, while BayesC yielded higher accuracies than GBLUP‐REML for the other traits. In conclusion, fitting dominance effects did not impact accuracy of genomic prediction of breeding values in this population. 相似文献
13.
《畜牧与生物技术杂志(英文版)》2016,(4)
Background: Accurate evaluation of SNP effects is important for genome wide association studies and for genomic prediction. The genetic architecture of quantitative traits differs widely, with some traits exhibiting few if any quantitative trait loci(QTL) with large effects, while other traits have one or several easily detectable QTL with large effects.Methods: Body weight in broilers and egg weight in layers are two examples of traits that have QTL of large effect.A commonly used method for genome wide association studies is to fit a mixture model such as Bayes B that assumes some known proportion of SNP effects are zero. In contrast, the most commonly used method for genomic prediction is known as GBLUP, which involves fitting an animal model to phenotypic data with the variance-covariance or genomic relationship matrix among the animals being determined by genome wide SNP genotypes. Genotypes at each SNP are typically weighted equally in determining the genomic relationship matrix for GBLUP. We used the equivalent marker effects model formulation of GBLUP for this study. We compare these two classes of models using egg weight data collected over 8 generations from 2,324 animals genotyped with a42 K SNP panel.Results: Using data from the first 7 generations, both Bayes B and GBLUP found the largest QTL in a similar well-recognized QTL region, but this QTL was estimated to account for 24 % of genetic variation with Bayes B and less than 1 % with GBLUP. When predicting phenotypes in generation 8 Bayes B accounted for 36 % of the phenotypic variation and GBLUP for 25 %. When using only data from any one generation, the same QTL was identified with Bayes B in all but one generation but never with GBLUP. Predictions of phenotypes in generations 2 to 7 based on only 295 animals from generation 1 accounted for 10 % phenotypic variation with Bayes B but only6 % with GBLUP. Predicting phenotype using only the marker effects in the 1 Mb region that accounted for the largest effect on egg weight from generation 1 data alone accounted for almost 8 % variation using Bayes B but had no predictive power with GBLUP.Conclusions: In conclusion, In the presence of large effect QTL, Bayes B did a better job of QTL detection and its genomic predictions were more accurate and persistent than those from GBLUP. 相似文献
14.
基于BLUP和GBLUP方法估计北京油鸡胴体和肉质性状遗传参数的差异 总被引：1，自引：1，他引：0
旨在比较不同方法对遗传参数估计的差异,为未来北京油鸡胴体和肉质性状选育方法的制定提供参考依据。本研究利用传统最佳线性无偏预测（best linear unbiased prediction,BLUP）和基因组最佳线性无偏预测（genomic best linear unbiased prediction,GBLUP）两种方法对北京油鸡的胴体和肉质等性状进行了遗传参数估计。从系谱较为完整的北京油鸡群体中,选择100日龄体重相近的公鸡615只,测定其100日龄体重（BW）、屠宰率（EP）、胸肌率（BMP）、腿肌率（LMP）、腹脂率（AFP）、嫩度（T,以剪切力值表示）和肌内脂肪（IMF）等性状,并用SNP芯片（Illumina,60K）进行个体基因分型。结果表明,除IMF和剪切力（SF）遗传力基于两种方法的估值存在较大差异外,其余性状利用两种方法得到的遗传力估值差异较小;除嫩度外,GBLUP方法估计的遗传力均低于BLUP方法。所有胴体相关性状中,除屠宰率遗传力为低遗传力外,其余性状均属于中等遗传力性状。嫩度呈现低遗传力,而IMF基于BLUP法和GBLUP法的估计遗传力分别为中等（h2 =0.256）和低遗传力（h2 =0.107）。基于BLUP方法,IMF与BW、BMP和SF 3个性状间均呈高度遗传负相关（-0.572、-0.420、-0.682）,与EP的遗传相关为中度负相关（-0.234）,与AFP的遗传相关为中度正相关（0.420）;基于GBLUP方法,IMF与BW、BMP和SF 3个性状间均呈高度遗传负相关（-0.808、-0.725、-0.784）,与EP的遗传相关为高度负相关（-0.626）,与AFP的遗传相关为低度正相关（0.097）。综上,对于某些性状,基于传统的BLUP方法与新的GBLUP方法得到的遗传力与遗传相关估值存在较大差异,实际育种工作中,为提高育种效率,需要综合考虑。 相似文献
15.
Genomic and single-step evaluations of carcass traits of young bulls in dual-purpose cattle 下载免费PDF全文
下载免费PDF全文 Genetic evaluations for carcass traits of young bulls in Normande and Montbeliarde breeds are currently being developed in France. In order to determine a suitable genomic evaluation for three carcass traits of young bulls, genomic breeding values were estimated for young candidates to selection using different approaches. Records of 111,789 Normande and 118,183 Montbeliarde were used. Average progeny pre-adjusted performances (DYD) were calculated for sires. Evaluation approaches were compared based on an assessment of their accuracy (correlation between DYD and estimated breeding values [EBVs]) and bias (regression coefficient of DYD on EBVs) on the 20% youngest AI sires. All genomic approaches were generally more accurate than BLUP (+.045 to +.116 correlation points), except for age at slaughter where single-step GBLUP (SSGBLUP) was the only genomic method leading to a greater accuracy (+.038 to +.126 points). The best setting of the SSGBLUP relationship matrix was characterized by a weight of 30% for pedigree information in the genomic relationship matrix. SSGBLUP was the most valuable evaluation approach for the evaluation of carcass traits of Normande and Montbeliarde young bulls. 相似文献
16.
Nasir Moghaddar Daniel J Brown Andrew A Swan Phillip M Gurman Li Li Julius H van der Werf 《Zeitschrift für Tierzüchtung und Züchtungsbiologie》2022,139(1):71-83
The objective of this study was to investigate the accuracy of genomic prediction of body weight and eating quality traits in a numerically small sheep population (Dorper sheep). Prediction was based on a large multi-breed/admixed reference population and using (a) 50k or 500k single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genotypes, (b) imputed whole-genome sequencing data (~31 million), (c) selected SNPs from whole genome sequence data and (d) 50k SNP genotypes plus selected SNPs from whole-genome sequence data. Furthermore, the impact of using a breed-adjusted genomic relationship matrix on accuracy of genomic breeding value was assessed. The selection of genetic variants was based on an association study performed on imputed whole-genome sequence data in an independent population, which was chosen either randomly from the base population or according to higher genetic proximity to the target population. Genomic prediction was based on genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP), and the accuracy of genomic prediction was assessed according to the correlation between genomic breeding value and corrected phenotypes divided by the square root of trait heritability. The accuracy of genomic prediction was between 0.20 and 0.30 across different traits based on common 50k SNP genotypes, which improved on average by 0.06 (absolute value) on average based on using prioritized genetic markers from whole-genome sequence data. Using prioritized genetic markers from a genetically more related GWAS population resulted in slightly higher prediction accuracy (0.02 absolute value) compared to genetic markers derived from a random GWAS population. Using high-density SNP genotypes or imputed whole-genome sequence data in GBLUP showed almost no improvement in genomic prediction accuracy however, accounting for different marker allele frequencies in reference population according to a breed-adjusted GRM resulted to on average 0.024 (absolute value) increase in accuracy of genomic prediction. 相似文献
17.
R. Abdollahi‐Arpanahi G. Morota B.D. Valente A. Kranis G.J.M. Rosa D. Gianola 《Zeitschrift für Tierzüchtung und Züchtungsbiologie》2015,132(3):218-228
Bootstrap aggregation (bagging) is a resampling method known to produce more accurate predictions when predictors are unstable or when the number of markers is much larger than sample size, because of variance reduction capabilities. The purpose of this study was to compare genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) with bootstrap aggregated sampling GBLUP (Bagged GBLUP, or BGBLUP) in terms of prediction accuracy. We used a 600 K Affymetrix platform with 1351 birds genotyped and phenotyped for three traits in broiler chickens; body weight, ultrasound measurement of breast muscle and hen house egg production. The predictive performance of GBLUP versus BGBLUP was evaluated in different scenarios consisting of including or excluding the TOP 20 markers from a standard genome‐wide association study (GWAS) as fixed effects in the GBLUP model, and varying training sample sizes and allelic frequency bins. Predictive performance was assessed via five replications of a threefold cross‐validation using the correlation between observed and predicted values, and prediction mean‐squared error. GBLUP overfitted the training set data, and BGBLUP delivered a better predictive ability in testing sets. Treating the TOP 20 markers from the GWAS into the model as fixed effects improved prediction accuracy and added advantages to BGBLUP over GBLUP. The performance of GBLUP and BGBLUP at different allele frequency bins and training sample sizes was similar. In general, results of this study confirm that BGBLUP can be valuable for enhancing genome‐enabled prediction of complex traits. 相似文献
18.
旨在比较不同方法对中国荷斯坦牛繁殖性状的基因组预测效果,选择最佳的基因组预测方法及信息矩阵权重组合（τ和ω）用于实际育种。本研究利用北京地区33个牧场1998—2020年荷斯坦牛群繁殖记录,分析了3个重要繁殖性状：产犊至首次配种间隔（ICF）、青年牛配种次数（NSH）和成母牛配种次数（NSC）共98 483~197 764条表型数据。同时收集了8 718头母牛和3 477头公牛的基因芯片数据,根据具有芯片数据的牛群结构划分为公牛验证群和母牛验证群。随后,通过BLUPF90软件的AIREMLF90和BLUPF90模块利用最佳线性无偏预测（BLUP）、基因组最佳线性无偏预测（GBLUP）和一步法（ssGBLUP）对3个性状进行基因组预测,不同方法的预测效果根据准确性和无偏性来评估。结果表明,3个繁殖性状均为低遗传力性状（0.03~0.08）;ssGBLUP方法中,各性状信息矩阵的权重取值能够在一定程度上提升基因组预测的效果;ICF、NSH和NSC在母牛验证群下的最佳权重取值分别为：τ=1.3和ω=0,τ=0.5和ω=0.4以及τ=0.5和ω=0;在公牛验证群下最优权重组合分别为：τ=1.5和ω=0,τ=1.3和ω=0.8以及τ=0.5和ω=0;基于最佳权重的ssGBLUP方法准确性较BLUP和GBLUP方法准确性分别提升了0.10~0.39和0.08~0.15,且无偏性最接近于1。综上,使用最佳权重组合的ssGBLUP时,各性状基因组预测结果具有较高准确性和无偏性,建议作为中国荷斯坦牛繁殖性状基因组选择方法。 相似文献
19.
旨在比较结合全基因组关联分析（genome-wide association study,GWAS）先验标记信息的基因组育种值（genomic estimated breeding value,GEBV）估计与基因组最佳线性无偏预测（genomic best linear unbiased prediction,GBLUP）方法对鸡剩余采食量性状育种值估计的准确性,为提高基因组选择准确性提供理论与技术支持。本研究选用广西金陵花鸡3个世代共2 510个个体作为素材,其中公鸡1 648只,母鸡862只,以42～56日龄期间的剩余采食量（residual feed intake,RFI）为目标性状,将试验群体随机分为两组,其中一组作为先验标记信息发现群体,用于GWAS分析并筛选最显著的top5%、top10%、top15%和top20%的位点作为先验标记信息;另外一组分别结合不同的先验标记信息进行遗传参数估计并比较基因组育种值的预测准确性,使用重复10次的五倍交叉验证法获取准确性,随后两组群体再进行交叉验证。研究结果表明,GBLUP计算RFI的遗传力为0.153,预测准确性为0.387～0.429,结合GWAS先验标记信息的基因组选择方法计算RFI的遗传力为0.139～0.157,预测准确性为0.401～0.448。将GWAS结果中P值最显著的top10%～top15%的SNPs作为先验信息整合至基因组选择模型中可以将RFI的预测准确性提升2.10%～5.17%。 相似文献